Dodgers Adding Scott Game Changer or Overpay?
The Dodgers bolstering their bullpen with Tanner Scott. Four years, 72 million dollars. Is this a steal or are we about to witness another big contract bust? Scott's recent performance is undeniable, high whiff rate, low hard-hit rate. But is that sustainable? He has a history of control issues, though improved last season. Is this a sign of real growth or just a flash in the pan?
With Sasaki already in the mix, are the Dodgers prioritizing short-term wins over long-term stability? How does this impact their pursuit of other free agents and their already hefty payroll? What does this signing mean for the rest of the NL West, and who are the biggest winners and losers in this deal? Let the debate begin.
Dodgers Adding Scott Game Changer or Overpay?
The Dodgers bolstering their bullpen with Tanner Scott. Four years, 72 million dollars. Is this a steal or are we about to witness another big contract bust? Scott's recent performance is undeniable, high whiff rate, low hard-hit rate. But is that sustainable? He has a history of control issues, though improved last season. Is this a sign of real growth or just a flash in the pan?
With Sasaki already in the mix, are the Dodgers prioritizing short-term wins over long-term stability? How does this impact their pursuit of other free agents and their already hefty payroll? What does this signing mean for the rest of the NL West, and who are the biggest winners and losers in this deal? Let the debate begin.
- By Anonymous