Fast Ball Talk

Is the Reds' interest in Nick Pivetta a smart move or a misallocation of resources? Their rotation is already crowded with young talent and injury-prone veterans. Wouldn't bolstering their anemic offense make more sense? Are they overvaluing pitching depth at the expense of desperately needed run production? Or perhaps this signals an upcoming trade involving one of their current starters? What kind of contract would Pivetta command, and can the Reds afford it while also addressing their offensive woes? Is this a smokescreen, a legitimate pursuit, or simply due diligence? Let the debate begin!