- Sun Jan 19, 2025 12:45 pm
#4284
The Dodgers are going all-in. A 72 million dollar deal for Tanner Scott after already landing Sasaki, Snell, Conforto, and Kim This offseason raises some eyebrows. Is this level of spending sustainable, even for a team like the Dodgers? Are they setting themselves up for long-term financial trouble, or is this a calculated risk with a potential championship payoff? With a bullpen already brimming with talent, where does Scott fit in? Is he guaranteed the closer role, or will Roberts continue his flexible approach? Scott’s recent performance justifies the investment, but his history of command issues could be a cause for concern. Will the Dodgers pitching whisperers work their magic again, or is this a gamble that could backfire? What’s more, with their payroll ballooning, how can other teams even compete? Is this good for baseball, or does it create an uneven playing field? Let’s hear your take. Are the Dodgers geniuses, or are they playing with fire?