- Sat Feb 22, 2025 1:05 pm
#6659
Tanner Scott's arrival as the Dodgers' new reliever has sparked a lot of conversation, especially with the announcement that he will be taking on the closer role to start the season. But here's the real question: does it even matter who the official closer is if the team is focused on winning?
Scott himself has made it clear that his priority is team success over personal accolades. This raises an interesting debate about the traditional role of a closer in baseball. Are we seeing a shift in how teams approach the end of games? With the Dodgers potentially using a matchup-based strategy, could we be witnessing the end of the one-inning closer era?
Moreover, with the uncertainty surrounding other key players, including the potential retirement of a fan favorite and injuries to pitchers, how do you think this will impact the Dodgers' chances this season? Will Scott's willingness to adapt and focus on winning be enough to rally the team, or will the pressure of the closer role weigh heavily on him?
Let’s also talk about the broader implications of Scott's mindset. In a league where individual stats often overshadow team goals, how refreshing is it to see a player prioritize winning above all else? Could this be a trend we see more of in the future, or is it just a rare mindset in a competitive environment?
What are your thoughts on Tanner Scott's approach? Do you believe the Dodgers are making the right call by naming him the closer, or should they stick to a more traditional strategy? Share your predictions for the season and how you think the bullpen will shape up as the year progresses!
Scott himself has made it clear that his priority is team success over personal accolades. This raises an interesting debate about the traditional role of a closer in baseball. Are we seeing a shift in how teams approach the end of games? With the Dodgers potentially using a matchup-based strategy, could we be witnessing the end of the one-inning closer era?
Moreover, with the uncertainty surrounding other key players, including the potential retirement of a fan favorite and injuries to pitchers, how do you think this will impact the Dodgers' chances this season? Will Scott's willingness to adapt and focus on winning be enough to rally the team, or will the pressure of the closer role weigh heavily on him?
Let’s also talk about the broader implications of Scott's mindset. In a league where individual stats often overshadow team goals, how refreshing is it to see a player prioritize winning above all else? Could this be a trend we see more of in the future, or is it just a rare mindset in a competitive environment?
What are your thoughts on Tanner Scott's approach? Do you believe the Dodgers are making the right call by naming him the closer, or should they stick to a more traditional strategy? Share your predictions for the season and how you think the bullpen will shape up as the year progresses!