- Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:11 pm
#4536
The Chicago Cubs are making waves in the offseason as they look to revamp their bullpen, and the names being tossed around are certainly intriguing. With interest in established arms like Ryan Pressly, Kenley Jansen, and David Robertson, it seems the Cubs are ready to shift their strategy from short-term fixes to potentially investing in more reliable, veteran talent.
This raises some interesting questions for us baseball fans. Do you think the Cubs are finally ready to break their mold and invest in a high-profile reliever? If they land Pressly, how do you see that impacting their chances in the upcoming season? Would he be the closer they desperately need, or is he past his prime?
Moreover, what does this mean for the Astros? Trading Pressly could open up financial flexibility for them, but would they be willing to part with a player who has been a cornerstone of their bullpen?
Let’s not forget the implications of the Cubs' recent offer to Tanner Scott. A four-year, $66M deal is a bold statement, signaling a potential change in their approach to building a competitive roster. Are we witnessing a new era for the Cubs, or is this just a temporary blip in their long-term strategy?
And speaking of strategy, how do you feel about the trend of teams investing heavily in their bullpens? Is it a smart move in today’s game, or do you think it’s better to focus on starting pitching and let the bullpen be a mix of younger, cheaper options?
Let’s dive into this discussion! What are your thoughts on the Cubs' potential moves, and how do you see the landscape of MLB bullpens evolving in the coming years?
This raises some interesting questions for us baseball fans. Do you think the Cubs are finally ready to break their mold and invest in a high-profile reliever? If they land Pressly, how do you see that impacting their chances in the upcoming season? Would he be the closer they desperately need, or is he past his prime?
Moreover, what does this mean for the Astros? Trading Pressly could open up financial flexibility for them, but would they be willing to part with a player who has been a cornerstone of their bullpen?
Let’s not forget the implications of the Cubs' recent offer to Tanner Scott. A four-year, $66M deal is a bold statement, signaling a potential change in their approach to building a competitive roster. Are we witnessing a new era for the Cubs, or is this just a temporary blip in their long-term strategy?
And speaking of strategy, how do you feel about the trend of teams investing heavily in their bullpens? Is it a smart move in today’s game, or do you think it’s better to focus on starting pitching and let the bullpen be a mix of younger, cheaper options?
Let’s dive into this discussion! What are your thoughts on the Cubs' potential moves, and how do you see the landscape of MLB bullpens evolving in the coming years?
- By Anonymous