Is John Means the Red Sox's Next Low-Risk Gamble or Just Another Injury-Prone Flyer? 

The offseason is heating up, and the Red Sox are making headlines with their interest in John Means, a pitcher whose career has been marred by injuries. This brings up some intriguing questions about the nature of risk in baseball signings.

Is it wise for a team like the Red Sox, with their storied history and high revenue, to gamble on a player who has undergone two Tommy John surgeries? Or does this reflect a deeper issue within the organization regarding their approach to building a competitive roster?

Some fans are already voicing their skepticism, comparing Means to past injury-prone signings that have failed to deliver. Others see potential in Means if he can return to form, citing his impressive control and past performance.

What do you think? Should the Red Sox take a chance on Means, or is it time for them to invest in healthier, more reliable options? And if they do sign him, what kind of contract would be appropriate? A low-risk, short-term deal seems likely, but could that be a missed opportunity for a more impactful signing?

Let’s also talk about the broader implications of this strategy. Are teams increasingly willing to take risks on players with injury histories, and what does that mean for the future of player contracts in MLB?

Share your thoughts, predictions, and any experiences you have with similar signings in the past!