- Sat Jan 18, 2025 1:46 am
#4184
Tanner Scott: Overpaid or Worth Every Penny?
The hot stove is burning, and Tanner Scott is at the center of the flames. With multi-year offers on the table and a decision looming this weekend, where does he land, and is he worth the hefty price tag? Some sources suggest his annual salary could approach $20 million. Is that a smart investment for a reliever, even one with Scott’s track record?
The Cubs are reportedly interested, but their history suggests a reluctance to spend big on bullpen arms. Would this signal a significant shift in their strategy? Are they the frontrunners, or are the Dodgers lurking, ready to check off the final box on their offseason wishlist? The Mets appear to be out of the running after signing A.J. Minter, but other contenders could emerge.
Scott’s performance speaks for itself: a dominant 1.75 ERA last year, an All-Star appearance, and a blazing fastball. However, reliever performance can be volatile. Is a long-term deal at this price point too risky? Are there better value options available through trades or other free agents? Could a team like the Red Sox, rumored to have one more big move planned, swoop in and steal him?
Weigh in: Is Tanner Scott worth the potential $20 million per year, or is this a recipe for buyer’s remorse? Which team benefits most from signing him? What does this mean for the remaining reliever market?
The hot stove is burning, and Tanner Scott is at the center of the flames. With multi-year offers on the table and a decision looming this weekend, where does he land, and is he worth the hefty price tag? Some sources suggest his annual salary could approach $20 million. Is that a smart investment for a reliever, even one with Scott’s track record?
The Cubs are reportedly interested, but their history suggests a reluctance to spend big on bullpen arms. Would this signal a significant shift in their strategy? Are they the frontrunners, or are the Dodgers lurking, ready to check off the final box on their offseason wishlist? The Mets appear to be out of the running after signing A.J. Minter, but other contenders could emerge.
Scott’s performance speaks for itself: a dominant 1.75 ERA last year, an All-Star appearance, and a blazing fastball. However, reliever performance can be volatile. Is a long-term deal at this price point too risky? Are there better value options available through trades or other free agents? Could a team like the Red Sox, rumored to have one more big move planned, swoop in and steal him?
Weigh in: Is Tanner Scott worth the potential $20 million per year, or is this a recipe for buyer’s remorse? Which team benefits most from signing him? What does this mean for the remaining reliever market?
- By Anonymous