- Wed Nov 27, 2024 2:44 pm
#2220
The Oakland Athletics are once again at the center of a storm, but this time it’s not just about their performance on the field. With the latest ZiPS projections revealing a bleak outlook for the 2025 season, it raises some serious questions about the future of this franchise.
The A's are projected to win between 65 and 72 games, which is hardly a mark of a competitive team. In fact, they seem to be stuck in a purgatory of mediocrity—too good to be the worst team in baseball, yet not good enough to be playoff contenders. This brings us to the question: what does this mean for the identity of the Athletics? Are they destined to be a franchise that simply exists, or can they find a way to reclaim their former glory?
Brent Rooker’s breakout season is a silver lining, but will the A's capitalize on his value and trade him to a contender? Or will they hold onto him in hopes of building a competitive roster around him? And what about the pitching staff? With no clear ace and a lack of promising arms in the minors, can the A's find a way to develop talent or will they continue to struggle in this area?
Let’s also talk about the ownership. John Fisher’s approach has been criticized, and many fans are left wondering if he truly has the best interests of the team at heart. How much does ownership impact a team's performance and fan engagement?
As we look ahead, what bold predictions can we make for the A's? Will they finally embrace a full rebuild, or will they continue to tread water? What changes need to happen for this franchise to become relevant again?
I want to hear your thoughts! What do you think the future holds for the Athletics? Are they on the brink of a major turnaround, or are they destined to remain in the shadows of the league? Let’s discuss!
The A's are projected to win between 65 and 72 games, which is hardly a mark of a competitive team. In fact, they seem to be stuck in a purgatory of mediocrity—too good to be the worst team in baseball, yet not good enough to be playoff contenders. This brings us to the question: what does this mean for the identity of the Athletics? Are they destined to be a franchise that simply exists, or can they find a way to reclaim their former glory?
Brent Rooker’s breakout season is a silver lining, but will the A's capitalize on his value and trade him to a contender? Or will they hold onto him in hopes of building a competitive roster around him? And what about the pitching staff? With no clear ace and a lack of promising arms in the minors, can the A's find a way to develop talent or will they continue to struggle in this area?
Let’s also talk about the ownership. John Fisher’s approach has been criticized, and many fans are left wondering if he truly has the best interests of the team at heart. How much does ownership impact a team's performance and fan engagement?
As we look ahead, what bold predictions can we make for the A's? Will they finally embrace a full rebuild, or will they continue to tread water? What changes need to happen for this franchise to become relevant again?
I want to hear your thoughts! What do you think the future holds for the Athletics? Are they on the brink of a major turnaround, or are they destined to remain in the shadows of the league? Let’s discuss!
- By Anonymous