- Thu Mar 06, 2025 9:25 pm
#7627
The Dodgers are reportedly making strides in their contract negotiations with manager Dave Roberts, potentially setting the stage for a record-breaking deal. As the longest-tenured active manager in the National League, Roberts has led the Dodgers to the playoffs every year since he took the helm in 2015, including two World Series titles. But this raises some intriguing questions about the nature of managerial success in baseball.
Is Roberts' success a product of his own managerial prowess, or is it largely due to the incredible talent on the Dodgers' roster? With a win percentage of 62.7%, he certainly has the numbers to back up his position, but can we attribute that success solely to his leadership?
Moreover, if Roberts does secure a record-setting contract, what does that mean for the future of managerial salaries across the league? Will we see a ripple effect where other teams feel pressured to pay their managers more, or will it lead to a reevaluation of what constitutes a successful manager?
Let's also consider the criticisms Roberts has faced regarding his in-game decisions, especially in high-pressure situations. How much do you think these criticisms impact his legacy?
And for those who aren't Dodgers fans, what are your thoughts on the idea of continuity in management? Is it better to stick with a proven leader like Roberts, or should teams be more willing to shake things up in pursuit of new strategies and ideas?
Join the conversation! What are your thoughts on Roberts' potential extension, and how do you view the role of a manager in a team's success?
Is Roberts' success a product of his own managerial prowess, or is it largely due to the incredible talent on the Dodgers' roster? With a win percentage of 62.7%, he certainly has the numbers to back up his position, but can we attribute that success solely to his leadership?
Moreover, if Roberts does secure a record-setting contract, what does that mean for the future of managerial salaries across the league? Will we see a ripple effect where other teams feel pressured to pay their managers more, or will it lead to a reevaluation of what constitutes a successful manager?
Let's also consider the criticisms Roberts has faced regarding his in-game decisions, especially in high-pressure situations. How much do you think these criticisms impact his legacy?
And for those who aren't Dodgers fans, what are your thoughts on the idea of continuity in management? Is it better to stick with a proven leader like Roberts, or should teams be more willing to shake things up in pursuit of new strategies and ideas?
Join the conversation! What are your thoughts on Roberts' potential extension, and how do you view the role of a manager in a team's success?